2 Likes
I’m a little confused with all this legal stuff, but interesting read.
At the center of the dispute is a proposed 1976 contract between Thang (Clinton’s company) and Worrell, which purported to grant Thang full ownership of sound recordings Worrell worked on in exchange for royalties.
Worrell signed the agreement, but, as a New York state court later determined, Thang never countersigned it, rendering it invalid.
The Sixth Circuit found that despite the agreement’s invalidity, both parties acted for years as though it was in effect.
…